Thursday, 10 November 2016

The catastrophe

http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/donald-trump-election-win-means-instability-for-the-world-a-1120464.html

This cite contains European opinions and it points out great insights about Trump being a president. The author seems to dislike Trump being the president of US, the greatest and powerful country. He sarcastically compares Trump's outrageous and immature actions with his presidency. He also says, "it is a catastrophe" himself. It seems like this whole article is assaulting Trump, but also kinda gives help to him because the author says he needs a helper. The author is giving suggestions to what Trumps should do, but Trump is not interested in that and is ignorant and self-righteous. In this article, it also shows the immoral and impure part of the US. The voters of Trump said, "lock her up" to Hillary Clinton. This shows no respect for others which might bring conflict between the groups that voted for Trump and those for Clinton. After Trump being elected as president, the world and the US became unstable for the president of the strongest nation is irresponsible and egoistic.

Tuesday, 1 November 2016

US election

http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/37608060



This cite explains the situation of the US presidential elections. It talks about Barack Obama, who is the current president of the US and how he has to leave his job. Mainly, it is about Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump's involvement in the presidential election where Hillary Clinton is for the Democrats and Donald Trump for the republicans. The cite also explains why the presidential election for the US is important. I think that the writer doesn't have any interest in the current delegates for the writer says, "It is almost impossible that they will receive enough votes to be elected as president". This, to me, it shows the corruption in the US (no offense) for the citizens have to choose delegates they are not passionate about choosing them. It seems hard for the US to choose the right president because they almost have ties. It would be intriguing how the government would solve this problem. if either of the delegates are chosen, I think there would be revolts because half of the country doesn't like Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump. Also, I think that the writer supports the UK because the writer only talks about the relations of the US and the UK even though there are other connections other than just UK. It seems that the writer calls for the UK to be interested in the US presidential elections because the writer talks about the connections between the UK and the US only other than other countries too.